|
We are seeking input from professionals such as yourself, to help us determine
the direction of future research. Your insights and opinions are important and
valued. Your selection is based upon your knowledge and experience with key
land use and habitat management issues. Thank you for participating.
|
1. What type of land holding do you or others in your organization manage?
(Click all that apply)
privately-owned open space
public-owned open space
general land trust
restoration site
habitat reserve or ecological
refuge
park or recreational area
multiple use (e.g., habitat
reserve and recreational area)
|
|
2. Approximately, how large of an area is this holding? (If multiple holdings
then, how large on average?)
< 10 acres (4
hectares)
10 – 100 acres (40
hectares)
100 – 640 acres
1 – 10 square miles
(2. 6 – 26 square kilometers)
10 – 50 square miles
50 – 100 square miles
> 100 square miles
|
|
3. Click on those types of land surface features that are of
interest. For these features, click on the size of the smallest
feature or characteristic length associated each feature (in meters)?
|
|
<0.5
|
0.5 – 1
|
1 – 5 |
6 – 10 |
11 – 20 |
20 – 50 |
> 50 |
invasive plants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
removal of vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction of leaf cover or vigor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vegetation dieback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increasing bare soil exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
soil erosion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fire scars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gullying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
soil deposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trampling of vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trail formation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trail widening and coalescing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Given the ephemeral nature of shrubland and
grassland vegetation in southern California, their response on multi-year imagery can vary,
even when images are captured on or near anniversary dates. To what degree might you be interested in
year-to-year differences or changes in the following variables?
|
|
very interested
|
mildly
interested
|
no
interest
|
proportion of green herb cover |
|
|
|
presence/absence of annuals |
|
|
|
shrub or tree leaf area index |
|
|
|
|
5. Do you or someone in your organization conduct any type of comprehensive
monitoring of the land holding that you manage?
|
|
Yes |
No
|
Not pertinent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. If you answered yes to the previous question, by what means (click on any that are
pertinent)?
Ground reconnaissance
Aircraft reconnaissance
(Visual inspection and/or hand sketching on maps)
Field sampling (e.g., plots
and/or transects)
Remotely sensed imagery
(including aerial photography)
Combination of ground and
remote sensing approaches
|
7. Is it important to monitor your
entire land holding in a comprehensive
(i.e., spatially complete) manner? |
|
Yes |
No
|
Not pertinent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Is it feasible to monitor your
entire land holding in a comprehensive
manner with ground-based procedures? |
|
Yes |
No
|
Not pertinent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Do you currently use any type of remotely sensed
images (including aerial photographs), or maps or tabular data derived from such imagery for purposes
of monitoring land cover changes?
|
|
Yes |
No
|
Not pertinent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. If you answered yes to the previous question, then what type of imagery (click on any that are pertinent)?
B & W aerial photographs
color aerial photographs
color infrared aerial
photographs
digital orthophotographs
other digital airborne
imagery
digital satellite imagery
|
|
11. Balancing (1) the desire for monitoring information,
(2) the rate at which disturbance related effects are likely to occur, and (3)
the
realities of funding, for what time interval should maps of land cover changes
for your landholdings be produced?
Annually
Every two years
Every three years
Every four years
Every five years
Every five to seven
years
Every eight to ten
years
|
|
12. Is it important and/or would it be useful to have
information on land use and land cover changes that occur on the periphery of
your land holdings?
|
|
Yes |
No
|
Not pertinent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. If you answered yes to the previous question, for
how wide of strip or buffer surrounding your land holding (in meters)?
100 m
200 m
500 m
1000 m
2000 m
5000 m
>5000 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Balancing (1) the desire for monitoring information,
(2) the rate at which surrounding changes in land use and land cover are likely to
occur, and (3) the realities of funding, between what time interval should maps of land use and land
cover changes for lands
adjacent to your land holdings be produced?
Annually
Every two years
Every three years
Every four years
Every five years
Every five to seven
years
Every eight to ten
years
|
Enter your additional comments in the
space provided below (Optional): |
|
|
|
|
|